When it comes to working out, most people assume more is always better.
If you want to be bigger and stronger, you should spend more time lifting heavy things, right?
And if you want to be leaner, you should just suck it up and spend more time on the Stairmaster, no?
Well, not quite.
That MO has some relevance to gaining size and strength because you do have to keep overloading your muscles to keep making gains, but it can easily lead to overtraining if you don’t know what you’re doing.
Cardio is different, though.
Namely, the only reason to do a lot of cardio is to improve your cardiovascular endurance.
If you don’t really care about, though, and you just want to build muscle, lose fat, and look as good as possible, then you want to take a different approach.
And that’s what we’re going to dive into in this article
You’re going to get answers to all your most pressing questions, like…
- How much cardio should you do to lose weight?
- What about building muscle? Is cardio good or bad?
- How much cardio is too much? What happens when you do too much?
- What type of cardio is best and why?
By the end, you’re going to know how to create the perfect cardio routine for you and your goals.
So let’s get to it.
- How Much Cardio Should You Really Do?
- What About Cardio and Muscle Growth?
- Should You Do Cardio or Weights First?
- The Bottom Line on How Much Cardio You Should Do
Table of Contents
+Want to listen to more stuff like this? Check out my podcast!
How Much Cardio Should You Really Do?
For decades we’ve been taught that we should all be running, stepping, and jazzercising our way to fitness.
This, combined with a low fat diet, was the mission statement of the nineties. Any foods that were full fat were sinful and anything less than an hour per day on the treadmill was just plain laziness.
Obesity rates have continued to soar and people are more confused than ever about what it really takes to “shift” fat and get ripped.
There’s good news, though.
Thanks mainly to the scientific advances and the efforts of the evidence-based fitness community to disseminate the research, we now know better.
We know, for example, that eating fat doesn’t necessarily make us fat and that grinding our joints to dust doesn’t necessarily make us lean and healthy.
In fact, doing grueling amounts of cardio can actually harm us more than it can help. For example…
- Research shows that endurance athletes are at a higher risk of heart dysfunction than the general, non-running public. Moreover, the older they get and the more miles they log, the worse the problem gets.
- Studies also show that marathoners develop more arterial plaque than sedentary non-runners, which increases the risk of stroke and dementia.
- Spend a bit of time with dyed-in-the-wool endurance athletes and you’ll quickly notice how many problems they have with their joints, tendons, and bones.
I wouldn’t go as far as saying that doing too much cardio can kill you, but that’s not wholly inaccurate, either.
The reality is if your goal is to look and feel great, then doing more cardio–and exercise in general–isn’t always better.
And that’s why my position on cardio is this:
You should do as much cardio as it takes to achieve your goals and no more, and it shouldn’t be so much that it impairs your strength training, recovery, or health.
So, with that in place, let’s now get a bit more specific about how much cardio you should be doing based on your goals.
How Much Cardio You Should Do to Lose Weight
If I were a betting man, I’d wager that you’re here because you want to lose weight as quickly and healthily as possible.
I’d also wager that you’ve heard that cardio is absolutely vital to this–that you simply can’t lose any meaningful amount of weight without sacrificing gallons of sweat to the human hamster wheels.
Well, I have good news:
You don’t have to do cardio to lose weight–proper dieting alone is enough.
In fact, research shows that just doing cardio guarantees little in the way of fat loss. Ironically, many people wind up even fatter than when they began their exercise routines.
That said, if you want to maximize fat loss, cardio can certainly help. If used correctly (which we’ll talk more about soon), cardio will help you drop body fat faster.
But, more good news:
You don’t need to do more than an hour or two of cardio per week when you want to lose weight.
No, that’s not a typo. Not per day but per week.
A personal case in point:
I cut down to this look of about 8% body fat doing no more than 1.5 to 2 hours of cardio per week. And I can maintain it with even less.
You see, there are three reasons that, by itself, cardio isn’t as great for weight loss as you’ve been led to believe.
1. It’s too easy to eat the calories you burn.
You might be surprised how much you have to move just to burn a few hundred calories (about 30 minutes of vigorous exercise).
And you might be equally surprised at how easy it is to eat all those calories back without even realizing it. A couple handful of nuts and a piece of fruit is all it takes.
Now, any energy burned supports your weight loss efforts, of course, but my point is it’s not enough to just exercise without also knowing how to regulate your food intake.
If left to its own devices, your body will naturally increase its appetite to negate most of the fat-burning benefits provided by the exercise.
2. Your body adapts to reduce its energy expenditure.
Most people that “can’t lose weight” are simply overeating. They may not realize it, but that’s the whole story.
What can also get in the way of consistent weight loss, though, is the adaptive element of exercise.
Specifically, the more you do a certain type of activity, the more your body adapts to increase efficiency, and the more this occurs, the less energy it burns.
This leads people to believe they’re burning more calories in their workouts than they actually are, which in turn leads to accidental overeating and weight loss plateaus.
3. Cardio doesn’t preserve muscle (and can even accelerate muscle loss).
We may say we want to lose weight, but what we really mean is we want to lose fat and not muscle.
This isn’t just semantics, either.
It’s a very important distinction because how the scale changes isn’t nearly as important as your body composition–the amount of muscle and fat you have.
Starve yourself and do a ton of cardio and you’ll lose weight, but a lot of it is going to be muscle, and that’s the fast track to skinny fat.
The key here is resistance training.
If you want to lose fat faster and preserve–or even build–muscle, then you absolutely must include resistance training in your exercise regimen.
So, as you can see, cardio is a double-edged sword with seriously diminishing returns. It can help you get leaner faster, but it can also burn away your muscle and health.
Now, I mentioned earlier that I do (and recommend), no more than a couple hours of cardio per week for losing fat.
As you’ve probably guessed, there’s a bit more to this advice…
The Best Type of Cardio for Burning Fat, Not Muscle
The best way to include cardio in a weight loss regimen is to do as little as needed to reach your desired rate of weight loss and stay fit, and no more.
For best results do . . .
- At least two low- to moderate-intensity cardio workouts per week of 20-to-40 minutes each.
- One HIIT workout per week if you enjoy it.
- No more than 2-to-3 hours of cardio per week.
- Cardio and weightlifting on separate days. If that isn’t possible, lift weights first and try to separate the two workouts by at least 6 hours.
Although you’ll often hear fitness gurus tout HIIT as the most effective kind of cardio for fat loss, this isn’t true. Moderate-intensity, steady-state cardio is just as good at fat-burning, easier to recover from, and doesn’t sap your motivation or energy as much as HIIT, which is why I recommend you do it for the majority of your cardio workouts.
What About Cardio and Muscle Growth?
Many bodybuilders and fitness folk shun cardio because, they claim, it gets in the way of building muscle.
Well, it’s not that cut-and-dried.
Cardio doesn’t mystically shrivel your muscle and sap your strength. In fact, it can even help with muscle growth, provided you don’t do too much or the wrong kind.
Check out this article to learn more:
Concurrent Training: The Right Way to Combine Cardio and Strength Training
Should You Do Cardio or Weights First?
I’ll keep this short and sweet:
Lift first and then do your cardio.
This way you’ll be freshest for your lifting, which will help you progress faster in your workouts (and thus gain muscle and strength faster).
The Bottom Line on How Much Cardio You Should Do
As much as I rail against the mainstream fitness scene, I have to admit it’s changing for the better.
Proper weightlifting is getting more popular.
Starvation diets are losing sway.
Honest supplement companies are gaining ground.
And people are finally realizing that you don’t need to be obsessed with aerobics to have a great body.
Here’s the long story short:
If you want to be lean, muscular, and healthy, then you want to do at least a few hours of resistance training per week (very important!) and do just enough cardio to reach your goals but not more.
Do that, eat sensibly, and you can’t lose.
What’s your take on how much cardio you should do? Have anything else to share? Let me know in the comments below!
Scientific References +
- American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The Recommended Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness, and Flexibility in Healthy Adults - PubMed. (n.d.). Retrieved July 9, 2020, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9624661/
- Gergley, J. C. (2009). Comparison of two lower-body modes of endurance training on lower-body strength development while concurrently training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(3), 979–987. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a0629d
- Stephen H Boutcher 1. (n.d.). High-intensity Intermittent Exercise and Fat Loss - PubMed. Retrieved July 9, 2020, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21113312/
- Trapp, E. G., Chisholm, D. J., Freund, J., & Boutcher, S. H. (2008). The effects of high-intensity intermittent exercise training on fat loss and fasting insulin levels of young women. International Journal of Obesity, 32(4), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803781
- MacPherson, R. E. K., Hazell, T. J., Olver, T. D., Paterson, D. H., & Lemon, P. W. R. (2011). Run sprint interval training improves aerobic performance but not maximal cardiac output. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 43(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e5eacd
- Trapp, E. G., Chisholm, D. J., Freund, J., & Boutcher, S. H. (2008). The effects of high-intensity intermittent exercise training on fat loss and fasting insulin levels of young women. International Journal of Obesity, 32(4), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803781
- Treuth, M. S., Hunter, G. R., & Williams, M. (1996). Effects of exercise intensity on 24-h energy expenditure and substrate oxidation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 28(9), 1138–1143. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199609000-00009
- Tremblay, A., Simoneau, J. A., & Bouchard, C. (1994). Impact of exercise intensity on body fatness and skeletal muscle metabolism. Metabolism, 43(7), 814–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(94)90259-3
- Willis, L. H., Slentz, C. A., Bateman, L. A., Shields, A. T., Piner, L. W., Bales, C. W., Houmard, J. A., & Kraus, W. E. (2012). Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults. Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(12), 1831–1837. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01370.2011
- Thomas, D. M., Bouchard, C., Church, T., Slentz, C., Kraus, W. E., Redman, L. M., Martin, C. K., Silva, A. M., Vossen, M., Westerterp, K., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2012). Why do individuals not lose more weight from an exercise intervention at a defined dose? an energy balance analysis. Obesity Reviews, 13(10), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01012.x
- Melanson, E. L., Keadle, S. K., Donnelly, J. E., Braun, B., & King, N. A. (2013). Resistance to exercise-induced weight loss: Compensatory behavioral adaptations. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 45(8), 1600–1609. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31828ba942
- Sawyer, B. J., Bhammar, D. M., Angadi, S. S., Ryan, D. M., Ryder, J. R., Sussman, E. J., Bertmann, F. M. W., & Gaesser, G. A. (2015). Predictors of fat mass changes in response to aerobic exercise training in women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(2), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000726
- Paffenbarger, R. S., Hyde, R., Wing, A. L., & Hsieh, C. C. (1986). Physical Activity, All-Cause Mortality, and Longevity of College Alumni. New England Journal of Medicine, 314(10), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198603063141003
- Quinn, T. J., Sprague, H. A., van Huss, W. D., & Olson, H. W. (1990). Caloric expenditure, life status, and disease in former male athletes and non-athletes. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 22(6), 742–746. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199012000-00002
- Duca, L., Da Ponte, A., Cozzi, M., Carbone, A., Pomati, M., Nava, I., Cappellini, M. D., & Fiorelli, G. (2006). Changes in erythropoiesis, iron metabolism and oxidative stress after half-marathon. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 1(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02934717
- Bos, D., Ikram, M. A., Elias-Smale, S. E., Krestin, G. P., Hofman, A., Witteman, J. C. M., Van Der Lugt, A., & Vernooij, M. W. (2011). Calcification in major vessel beds relates to vascular brain disease. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 31(10), 2331–2337. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.232728
- Lluís Mont 1, David Tamborero, Roberto Elosua, Irma Molina, Blanca Coll-Vinent, Marta Sitges, Bárbara Vidal, Andrea Scalise, Alejandro Tejeira, Antonio Berruezo, Josep Brugada, G. (Grup I. de R. en F. A. I. (n.d.). Physical Activity, Height, and Left Atrial Size Are Independent Risk Factors for Lone Atrial Fibrillation in Middle-Aged Healthy Individuals - PubMed. Retrieved July 9, 2020, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18178694/
- Sposato, L. A., & Saposnik, G. (2013). Stroke rates vary substantially across cohorts of patients with atrial fi brillation Implications for practice. Europace, 6(9), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace