- Most men can naturally gain 40 to 50 pounds of muscle in their lifetimes, and most women can naturally gain 20 to 25 pounds.
- Research shows that you can use the circumference of your wrists and ankles to predict how much muscle you can gain naturally.
- It takes at least 4 to 5 years of proper dieting and training to approach your genetic potential for whole-body muscularity.
Some people say that with enough hard work, patience, and food, you can get as big and strong as you want.
That there are no hard limits to your potential for whole-body muscle gain.
On the other hand, others say all it takes to more or less max out your size and strength is a few years of proper training, unless you have elite genetics and a penchant for pain.
Both sides often have persuasive physiological arguments as well, which can be difficult to evaluate as a layman.
The meteoric rise of steroid use has made the discussion even more convoluted, because while some guys (and gals) are so freakishly huge that steroids are obviously involved, many drug users fly under the radar and set unrealistic expectations for others.
To sidestep the issue of secret anabolic use, oftentimes people point to the exceptional muscularity of bodybuilders before the advent of synthetic testosterone and other steroids in the late 1930s, like the great Eugen Sandow:
This, they say, is the purest, cleanest example of what’s possible without drugs.
If only it were that simple.
The home truth is this:
We all can only gain so much muscle naturally, and no amount of training, eating, or supplementing can raise that ceiling.
It’s impossible to calculate or predict the ceiling precisely, but there are several research-backed methods you can use to gain a fairly accurate estimate of how jacked you can probably get.
There’s good news, however:
The chances are good that you haven’t reached your peak muscularity yet. In fact, you’re probably nowhere close.
We’ll get into the specifics in a minute, but let me show you what I’m talking about first.
Here’s what I looked like after 1.5 years of following traditional bodybuilding training and diet advice:
I’d gained about 20 pounds since starting in the gym (~175 pounds here), which isn’t very impressive considering most of it was gained in the first 10 months—the “newbie gains” phase.
Here’s another shot of me a little later:
At this point I’d been training regularly for about 7 years, weighed around 195 lbs, and was about 16% body fat.
As you can tell, I’d gained a fair amount of size but was stuck in a rut at this point. I hadn’t made real progress in size or strength for years and thought maybe this was it.
Soon after that last picture was taken, however, I dramatically changed the way I was eating and training, and here’s me just a few years later:
That’s me at about 185 lbs and 7% body fat, which means that I had gained another ~10 pounds of muscle despite thinking I was an “intermediate” or even “advanced” weightlifter (I wasn’t, more on that soon).
The moral of this story is you may think you were dealt a shitty hand by your DNA, but you probably weren’t—you probably just need to learn how to play it.
Although you can only gain so much muscle, it’s likely a lot more than what you currently see in the mirror and certainly more than enough to look and feel great about your body.
And in this article you’ll get answers to all your most pressing questions, including . . .
- How much muscle can you gain naturally?
- Why are some people able to gain more muscle than others?
- What’s the most surefire way to reach your genetic potential for muscle growth as fast as possible?
- And more
Let’s get started.
Table of Contents
Would you rather listen to this article? Click the play button below!
Want to listen to more stuff like this? Check out my podcast!
There are many calculators and formulas floating around online that claim to indicate how much muscle you can add to your frame.
While some can give you a ballpark estimate, don’t put too much stock into their estimations because there’s no way to precisely predict how big you can get. There are just too many physiological variables in play. This is why even genetic testing provides little more than an informed guesstimate.
That said, science has revealed two physical traits that are highly correlated with the genetic potential for muscle gain:
- Bone structure
- Muscle structure
Let’s look at the first.
It’s true—some big people really are just “big boned.”
Research shows that people with larger, denser bones tend to have more muscle than people with smaller frames. Furthermore, they also tend to have higher testosterone levels and gain muscle faster from training.
This correlation is strong enough for some scientists to believe that how much bone you have is the limiting factor in determining how much muscle you can gain naturally.
One researcher in particular, Francis Holway, has even gone as far as calculating what he believes is the exact ratio of how much muscle you can gain based on how much bone you have.
Here’s how David Epstein explains it in his 2014 bestselling book The Sports Gene:
In measurements of thousands of elite athletes from soccer to weight lifting, judo, rugby, and more, Holway has found that each kilogram (2.2 pounds) of bone supports a maximum of five kilograms (11 pounds) of muscle.
In other words, most people can gain about five pounds of muscle for every pound of bone in their bodies.
Epstein likens the human skeleton to a bookcase, and the muscle to books, writing, “One bookcase that is four inches wider than another will weigh only slightly more. But fill both cases with books and suddenly the little bit of extra width on the broader bookcase translates to a considerable amount of weight.”
Also worth noting is the ratio seems to be slightly lower—about 4.1 pounds of muscle to 1 pound of bone—in women, which may help explain why women’s ultimate potential for muscularity is less than men’s.
At this point you’re probably wondering if it’s possible to measure your total bone mass, and thus muscular potential.
You can, but unfortunately it involves a trained anthropometrist (body measurer) taking 22 different measurements across your body, which is prohibitively expensive and inconvenient.
Some people say you can use a full-body x-ray called a DXA scan instead, but that’s not a workable solution, either. DXA determines the mineral content of your bone, not the total weight, which includes marrow, blood, and other components.
So, while muscle-to-bone ratio is probably the best method we have for determining the maximum amount of muscle you can build naturally, it’s simply infeasible.
Instead, we can use two scientifically validated proxies for your overall bone mass: the circumferences of your wrists and ankles.
This works because height being equal, people who have wider wrists and ankles tend to be naturally more muscular, gain muscle faster through training, and have a higher potential for muscle growth.
We can largely thank a researcher named Casey Butt, Ph.D., for figuring this out.
He parsed thousands of data points from surveys, clinical studies, and case studies, and found that the single best indicator of bone mass and thus muscle-building potential was the thickness of the wrists and ankles.
Why these two points of the body?
It’s likely that you could also find a similar relationship using other bones like the femur (thigh bone), humerus (upper arm bone), and clavicle (collar bone), but they’re too draped in flesh to allow for easy measurement. The wrists and ankles, though, are easy to measure accurately.
Butt, an avid lifter himself, also used his research to create a formula that allows you to easily predict your muscle-building potential, which we’ll talk more about in a minute.
Every muscle has two main parts:
- The “belly,” which is the part that contracts and that you want to grow.
- The tendon, which connects the belly to your skeleton.
In the context of muscle building, the main way muscle bellies and tendons vary in people is length. Some people’s bellies and tendons are shorter and longer than others’.
This is significant because a muscle’s potential for growth is largely determined by the length of the muscle belly.
Muscles can’t grow longer, only wider, so the longer your muscle bellies and shorter your tendons are, the more muscle mass you’ll be able to gain. Similarly, the shorter your bellies and longer your tendons are, the lower your potential for muscularity.
Here’s a good example of someone with very short muscle bellies and long tendons:
And as you can see, while he certainly has good muscle definition, he’s going to have a hell of a time getting bodybuilding-big arms.
Just to compare, here’s a shot of my arm, which has a longer muscle belly than his:
View this post on Instagram
If you want to know how your biceps stack up, bend your arm to 90 degrees, flex your biceps, and see how many fingers you can comfortably fit between your biceps and forearm.
If you can fit three fingers, your muscle bellies are below average length. If you can fit 2, you’re about average. If you can fit 1, you’re one of the lucky few with longer than average muscle bellies.
If you happen to be on #TeamSmallBelly, don’t worry, you aren’t SOL. Take heart because . . .
- Small muscle bellies in one muscle group (your arms) is no guarantee that other muscle groups have small muscle bellies as well.
- Although your potential for raw size might be more limited than some, you can absolutely develop great muscle definition (like this guy).
- There are other factors that are better predictors of how muscular you can get (which you’ll learn more about soon).
And let’s face it: there isn’t a natural bodybuilder in the world with 10/10 size and definition in every muscle group, so let’s be thankful for our strengths (yippee, arms for me) and accepting of our weak points (screw you, calves).
No discussion of the natural limitations of muscle gain would be complete without talking about the big t.
It is the primary hormonal driver of muscle growth after all.
In fact, its muscle-building effects are so strong that research shows artificially increasing your testosterone levels can put muscle on your frame without any exercise whatsoever.
In a study conducted by scientists at the Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, researchers split 43 resistance-trained men ranging from 19 to 40 years of age into four groups:
- Group one consumed a placebo and didn’t lift weights.
- Group two was injected with 600 mg of testosterone and didn’t lift weights.
- Group three consumed a placebo and lifted weights.
- Group four was injected with 600 mg of testosterone and lifted weights.
Everyone followed this protocol for 10 weeks, and before and after the study, the researchers measured the participants’ weight, strength, and body composition.
And the results illustrate why steroids are so popular.
As expected, the guys who didn’t lift weights or take steroids didn’t gain any muscle to speak of and added a measly 7 pounds to their squat and nothing to their bench press.
The natty lifters in group three fared significantly better and gained about 4.5 pounds of muscle and added about 77 pounds to their squat and bench press, which is fantastic for 10 weeks of training.
They could’ve skipped all the workouts, though, and just injected testosterone instead.
On average, the men in group two who took steroids and sat on their butts for 10 weeks gained 7 pounds of muscle and added 70 pounds to their squat and bench press.
It gets better too.
The people in group four who took steroids and lifted weights gained a mind-boggling 13.5 pounds of muscle. In 10 freaking weeks.
Yes, that’s 1.3 pounds of muscle per week and about half the amount a guy with above-average genetics could expect in his first year of weightlifting.
The steroided lifters also increased their squat and bench press by a whopping 132 pounds and gained eight times more size in their triceps and twice as much size in their quads as the natty lifters.
And let’s not forget this study was on the effects of just testosterone, which are only further magnified by other popular anabolic steroids including dianabol, trenbolone, nandrolone, boldenone, oxandrolone, stanozolol, and others.
So now you know what to think when someone trots out the “why would he/she/I lie about taking steroids?” red herring.
People lie about taking steroids because for just a couple hundred dollars per month, you can use them to get absolutely jacked and shredded shockingly fast and with minimal effort.
Based on this extreme example, it would seem a reasonable assumption that our testosterone levels would influence how much muscle we can ultimately gain.
Well, this is where things get interesting.
That assumption is certainly true if we’re talking about dramatically raising testosterone levels through steroid use, like in the study you just learned about. This most definitely raises the ceiling for muscle gain.
But here’s something that most people don’t know:
Fluctuation of testosterone levels within the physiological normal range doesn’t significantly help or hurt muscle growth.
In other words, if you increase your testosterone levels but they remain well within the range of normal—or around 300 to 1,000 ng/dl—you’re unlikely to notice any muscle-building benefits.
For reference, the average testosterone level among the lifters taking steroids in the study we just discussed was 3,244 ng/dl, or over three times the upper limit of what’s considered natural. And that was a baby dose by bodybuilding standards.
So, while natural testosterone levels influence muscle gain to a certain degree, it’s just not as important as most people think.
On the whole, your bone and muscle structures are much better predictors of how much muscle you can build naturally.
At this point you’ve probably had enough appetizers and are ready for your entree. So let’s serve it up.
How can you determine how much muscle you can gain?
Most formulas for this are solely based on height. The theory is the taller you are, the more “room” you have to add muscle to your frame, and thus, the bigger you’ll be able to get. There’s truth here, of course, but it’s too simplistic to produce consistently accurate estimates for people of all sizes and types.
For example, what if you’re below-average in height but above-average in bone size? You’d be able to gain more muscle than a height-based formula would predict.
That’s why I prefer Casey Butt’s formula.
That said, the downside to Butt’s formula is it’s only reliably accurate for men because all the data it was derived from was collected from men. Thus, we can’t be sure its calculations are equally applicable to women.
Women aren’t out of luck, however. There are other ways for them to estimate how much muscle they can gain, which we’ll get into in a minute.
As I mentioned earlier, Butt compiled a mountain of data in his research, including ankle and wrist measurements of drug-free, male bodybuilders ranging from 1947 to 2009.
In analyzing the data, he discovered a relationship between ankle and wrist size and genetic potential for muscle gain, and then created an equation that expresses it.
This equation made its way into the field and is now widely considered the most accurate way to estimate your genetic potential for muscle growth, and can also be used to estimate the maximum potential size of each major muscle group.
Here’s what it looks like . . .
Chances are that looks like gobbledygook to you, which is why I made a nifty calculator that does all the math for you.
How to Use the Casey Butt Calculator
1. Enter your height in inches.
2. Enter your wrist circumference in inches.
To measure, find the bony lump on the outside of your wrist (the styloid process), open your hand, and wrap a tape measure around the space between that lump and your hand.
3. Enter your ankle circumference in inches.
To measure, wrap a tape measure around your lower leg between your ankle bone and your calf muscle. Move the tape measure around to find the narrowest point.
4. Enter your ideal body fat percentage if you were to be at 100% of your muscle-building potential.
I recommend 8 to 10% because lower than that simply isn’t feasible for most guys.
You may have noticed that this calculator gives you a “bulked weight.”
This is simply 104% of your “total body weight” to account for the “extra” weight you’ll carry around in addition to muscle in the way of water, glycogen, and food.
You should also know that although the formula is based on records from “natural bodybuilders,” it’s entirely possible that many of them were using drugs.
It’s hilariously easy to cheat drug tests in most sports, bodybuilding especially, and steroids were legal and generally not tested for until about the 1980s.
Thus, it’s safe to assume that Butt’s numbers may be slightly inflated due to secret steroid use.
Additionally, much of the data used to create Butt’s formula came from top-level bodybuilders who comprise the genetic elite for muscle gain.
This is why it’s smart to look at your numbers from the calculator as an absolute ceiling of what you could achieve if you did everything right with your training and nutrition for years, rather than middle-of-the-road expectations.
Personally, I think it’s reasonable to subtract 5% from the numbers for a more conservative estimate of how big we can get without more or less devoting our lives to lifting weights.
For example, when I plug in my numbers, the calculator pegs my potential body weight at 210 pounds at 10% body fat. I’m sitting at 195 pounds right now at 10% body fat, and based on my 15+ years in the gym, I can say with some certainty that I have a snail’s chance in saltwater of reaching 210 naturally.
If I subtract 5% from 210, however, I get 199—just a few pounds above my current body weight. And I’d agree that at this point, I’ve probably gained more or less all the muscle available to me regardless of what I do in the kitchen or gym going forward.
Also, just in case you missed it above, this calculator uses a formula derived from data collected solely from men, so it won’t necessarily work for women.
That said, there may be a very similar correlation between bone and muscle mass in women just as in men. If so, then Butt’s formula would predict potential muscle gain just as well in women as men. We just don’t know yet, though.
The good news is there are several other evidence-based way to estimate how much muscle we can gain, and they do accommodate women.
Altogether, Lyle, Alan, and Martin have worked with hundreds of elite bodybuilders and athletes and are, I think, some of the smartest guys in the evidence-based fitness space.
Let’s look at what they have to say about muscle-building potential.
Lyle McDonald is a health and fitness researcher and writer, and his formula is based on his extensive reading of the research and one-on-one experience helping thousands of people build muscle and lose fat.
According to Lyle, most people will gain muscle more or less on this timescale:
(These numbers apply to men, by the way. Lyle says that women can cut these numbers in half.)
As you can see, Lyle says that guys can gain up to 40 to 50 lbs of muscle in their first 4 to 5 years of proper diet and training, and, unfortunately, that muscle gain is fairly negligible from there on out.
Furthermore, Lyle believes both age and starting condition reduce the potential for muscle gain. Older guys and gals will generally gain less than younger, and underweight people can gain a bit more than his data would suggest.
Lyle has concluded that someone who has been training improperly for several years has the potential to make “year one” gains when he or she starts training properly. I can attest to that personally, and I’ll get to what proper training looks like in a minute.
And just to make things easier and more fun, here’s a calculator that’ll show you how much muscle you can expect to gain over the next year, based on Lyle’s research:
Alan Aragon is a published researcher and fitness consultant who’s been designing programs for improving body composition and athleticism for over 20 years.
Based on what he’s seen working with everyone from everyday gymgoers to Olympic athletes, most men can gain muscle at about this rate:
Women, he says, should aim for about half this rate of progress for several reasons, including less bone mass, a smaller and weaker starting point, and others.
So, according to Alan, a 150-pound male beginner can gain about 1.5 to 2.25 lbs of muscle per month, or 18 to 27 lbs in year one.
Let’s say he does fairly well and gains 20 pounds in year one, and is now an “intermediate lifter” moving into year two. Looking above, he could now expect to gain 0.85 to 1.7 lbs of muscle per month, or 10 to 20 lbs in his second year in the gym.
Let’s say he now really dials in his diet and training and does indeed gain another 20 pounds of muscle over the year, putting him at 190 lbs and upgrading him to an “advanced lifter.”
Thus, his year-three potential gains are 5 to 10 lbs, and from there on out, his potential gains diminish to the vanishing point.
This example, by the way, mirrors my own journey in a way. Although it took way longer than it should’ve, I started weightlifting at about 155 pounds and 13% body fat and am now 195 pounds and 10%.
Martin Berkhan is a writer and fitness consultant, and his specialty is helping people get ridiculously lean.
As a result, he’s seen and reflected on many examples of what a natural lifter can ultimately achieve in terms of body composition. Based on his observations and calculations, Martin developed a simple formula:
Height in centimeters – 100 = Upper weight limit in kilograms in contest shape (4 to 5% body fat)
Here’s how this pans out for a few heights and poundages:
To calculate Martin’s predictions for other heights, multiply them in inches by 2.54 to convert into centimeters, and subtract 100 for your maximum weight in kilograms at 5% body fat (stage-ready shredded).
Finally, multiply this number by 2.2 to convert it back into pounds.
For example, I’m 6’1, which works out to 73 inches.
73 x 2.54 = 185
185 – 100 = 85
85 / 2.2 = 187
According to Martin’s formula, the most I could ever hope to weigh at 5% body fat is 187 pounds, which is just above my weight when I was at my leanest (183).
If your numbers have let some of the air out of your balloon, I understand.
You probably follow quite a few bodybuilders, fitness models, and “influencers” who put them to shame.
And that’s okay.
In fact, it’s good that you’re coming to this realization now, before unrealistic hopes can really sink their hooks in and set you up for major disappointment and failure later (or worse, drug use).
The good news, though, is this: no matter your genetic potential for muscle gain, you can build an outstanding physique.
I’ll use myself as an example again.
Objectively speaking, I may have slightly better-than-average genetics for strength and muscle gain, but I’m certainly no outlier.
Despite that, however, I’ve built a physique that might make people think otherwise. What they don’t know, is it’s taken me a very long time to get where I am today, as well as thousands of hours of punishing workouts.
In contrast, the Director of Marketing for my supplement company Legion maintains a weight of about 210 pounds at 18% body fat at 5’10—pegging his total lean mass within a few pounds of mine—by working out a couple times per week.
Moreover, he pays absolutely no attention to his calories or macros, hasn’t used steroids, and has taken several multiple-month breaks from the gym in the last few years.
Being big and strong is just in his DNA.
So my point is this: It doesn’t take stellar genetics to build a body you can be proud of.
And if you’re a woman, you’ll likely love the way you look after adding just 10 to 15 pounds of muscle in the right places on your body and dieting your way down to about 20% body fat.
It may take longer than you’d like to get the body you really want, and you may never be as muscular or defined as your Instagram idols, but you absolutely can transform your physique into something special.
(If you’d rather listen to this section of the article, click the play button below).
This is a wellspring of controversial fitness gossip, and particularly among men.
Some people say that it’s childish, rude, and unnecessary to ask or even wonder if so-and-so is “natty” or not. Don’t ask for whom the bell tolls and all that.
Others don’t take issue with the line of discussion but claim there are major problems with the common methods of analysis. Thus, they say, unless it’s completely obvious, it’s really impossible to know whether someone is on the sauce or not.
And still others can’t fathom why people purportedly into being healthy and fit would secretly use dangerous drugs to impress strangers on the Internet.
Here’s my position:
- I couldn’t care less whether someone does or doesn’t take steroids. That’s their business.
- I do care, however, when someone takes steroids and lies about it to deceive people. That’s when it becomes other people’s business.
Because it’s no different than lying about anything else to make a buck or burnish your bona fides, and it’s one of the reasons so many young men and women have wildly unrealistic expectations about what type of physique they can achieve naturally and should aspire to.
If a famous actor or actress radically transformed their physique in a matter of weeks for a major role, you’d probably want to know what really happened behind the scenes.
If an athlete suddenly has a breakthrough season, you might want to know if drugs helped them bring home the bacon.
And if a social media influencer is selling pills, powders, or PDFs they promise will help you look like them, you’d better want to know if they’re also on the #dedication because it changes everything.
Most people can understand why actors and athletes take steroids.
Fame and fortune are the stakes and most of their peers are using drugs to get jacked for movies and gain a competitive advantage. So joining in is a no-brainer.
It’s the third flavor of drug user—the Internet profiteer—that many people can’t seem to wrap their head around.
And so I get asked questions like these fairly often:
- “Why would someone on Instagram lie about taking steroids?”
- “What do they have to gain?”
- “Wouldn’t they get arrested?”
Well, they lie because most people frown upon steroid use. Thus, honesty would mean less trust, admiration, and PayPal transactions, which is what they have to gain. And no, steroid users are rarely busted.
Look at it like this:
Imagine you’re a low-IQ, low-agency, high-time-preference parasite who possesses no marketable knowledge or skills. Accordingly, your chances for achieving any sort of success or satisfaction in your life are so low your calculator just gave you the finger.
Then you a stumble upon a three-step formula that promises deliverance:
- Do whatever it takes to build a great body, including drugs and surgery.
- Post a lot of provocative pictures online to grow a following.
- Start hawking diet and exercise plans, coaching, supplements, and the like.
And just like that, you can start telling people you’re a blessed Internet entrepreneur whose true passion is saying “it’s for the kids.”
You see, the guys and gals using steroids generally have the best physiques, which garner the largest followings, which make the most money. The calculus is that simple.
The paydays can become quite substantial as well. Many influencers charge well over $1,000 per ad per 100,000 Instagram followers and twice that for YouTube subscribers, and many offer their own products as well.
Hence the tremendous financial pressure to take steroids if you’re an aspiring fitness star.
And what about the people who aren’t selling anything?
In most cases, they’re taking steroids to prop up their fragile sense of self-worth through the approval, adoration, and applause of strangers.
Harsh, I know, but after witnessing the underbelly of the fitness scene for years now, I’m just calling it like it is.
So, all this is why you should get savvy about discerning who does and doesn’t use drugs. Let’s learn how.
In some cases, it’s easy to tell if someone’s on steroids.
If they’re an IFBB pro or look like one, for instance, they’re on gear.
It’s rarely that obvious, though. Most steroid users don’t look like professional bodybuilders or physique athletes. In fact, many look far more “normal” that you might think.
That’s why you need clear, empirical methods of detecting steroid use.
One such method—for men at least—would involve obtaining someone’s wrist, ankle, and body composition measurements and then using Butt’s formula to determine whether his total lean mass is beyond what’s attainable naturally, but that’s too impractical.
A more feasible method involves calculating someone’s fat-free mass index (FFMI), which is a measurement of how much muscle you have per unit of height.
It’s calculated by dividing your fat-free mass in kilograms by your height in meters squared, and you can find yours by plugging your height, weight, and body fat percentage into this calculator:
As there’s a correlation between height and potential muscularity, and as organ weight doesn’t vary much from person to person, you’d expect to see a higher average FFMIs among steroid users than non-users as well as FFMIs among steroid users that are simply unobtainable naturally.
And that’s exactly what research has shown.
In the most famous and comprehensive study on FFMI and steroids, scientists at McLean Hospital calculated the FFMI of 157 young male athletes from around the Los Angeles and Boston areas, including several elite bodybuilders and world-record holding strongmen, as well as some gents undergoing a testosterone injection study.
Of these guys, 31 admitted to taking steroids in the past, 52 admitted to taking steroids within the previous year, and 74 claimed they had never taken steroids. The researchers also had everyone take a urine test to at least attempt to partially validate their claims.
After analyzing the data, the scientists found the steroid users had an average FFMI of 24.8 while the purported non-users averaged at 21.8. Another significant finding was not a single natural participant had an FFMI over 25, whereas many “enhanced” ones did.
This has led many people to declare 25 as the FFMI ceiling for natural (male) weightlifters. (There’s no similar research available on women, but it’s fair to assume their ceiling would be significantly lower.)
Others, however, point out that this is too simplistic because it doesn’t account for differences in height. The taller someone is, they say, the wider and thicker they are as well, and if you look at the data in the study, you’ll see that the taller athletes naturally had a higher FFMIs regardless of how much muscle they had gained through training.
They’re right. Here’s a chart of the heights and FFMIs of each of the participants:
As you can see by the line in the middle of the chart, as height increased, so did FFMI regardless of steroid use or not.
The researchers were aware of this as well, however, which is why they normalized the data to the average height of the participants, 5’11. This allowed them to more or less remove height as a potential confounder in determining the relationship between steroids and FFMI.
After normalizing the data and reassessing it, the scientists found that every single natural athlete had a normalized FFMI of 24.9 or less, whereas about half of the steroid users had a normalized FFMI of 25 or greater.
Some people have taken this to mean that anyone with a normalized FFMI of less than 25 is almost certainly natural. And they’re wrong.
The data clearly shows that about half of the steroid users had a normalized FFMI of less than 25, although many weren’t taking steroids at the time of the study, so it’s possible their numbers would’ve been higher if they’d been “on cycle.”
The more common conclusion from this research, though, is one that gets gallons of fake-natty blood up every day:
Sporting a normalized FFMI above 25 is proof positive of steroid use.
This should make the hackles of secret steroid users rise, too, because it’s basically correct.
If someone’s normalized FFMI is above 25, there’s an extremely good chance they’re taking or have taken steroids.
“Have taken?” you might be wondering.
Yep, having used steroids in the past can make it easier to get and stay unusually muscular and strong when “clean.”
Steroid users do lose a fair amount of muscle and strength when they stop ingesting and injecting, but anabolics alter your muscles at the cellular level in a way that makes it permanently easier to gain and maintain unnaturally large amounts of muscle.
To understand how this works, you need to understand one of the key cellular mechanisms that promotes muscle growth.
Muscle cells are unique in that they can contain multiple nuclei—known as myonuclei—which carries the DNA that orchestrates the construction of new muscle proteins.
Myonuclei need stem cells to build and repair muscle proteins, however, which are special cells that can be developed into many different types of cells in the body. Fundamentally, what happens is when you train your muscles, stem cells are recruited to donate nuclei to damaged muscle cells, which increases their potential for size and strength.
Not only that, but once a stem cell has donated a nucleus to a muscle cell, it remains there for good. This is the primary mechanism behind the phenomenon known as “muscle memory.”
In other words, every pound of muscle you gain contributes to your overall muscularity for the rest of your life.
Now, can you guess what skyrockets stem cell activation during and after training? You got it—steroids.
Workouts performed while taking steroids result in much larger amounts of nuclei donation to muscle cells, and thus much larger amounts of muscle and strength gain. And as those cellular changes last forever, people who aren’t on steroids now but who’ve used them in the past get to enjoy more muscle building potential than those who haven’t, and especially if they used large amounts of drugs for a long period of time.
Believe it or not, these effects are so powerful that doing just one cycle of the right steroids is enough to make a noticeable difference in the long term.
This is one of the reasons why ex-steroid users in the study we just reviewed had FFMIs much higher than what’s achievable for the average natural weightlifter.
This means, then, you can use steroids for a period, build a boatload of muscle fast, and then come off the drugs and retain much of your physique and performance with good enough dietary and training habits.
And if you’re also a bullshitter, you can now claim you’re natural and convince people to buy your dubious products and services.
This is far more common than you might think.
There are plenty of guys and gals who can sleep just fine at night making a living as a social media shyster claiming “natural” because they’re not currently on drugs.
They conveniently withhold the fact they were once on drugs, of course, and let’s be real, will likely be on cycle again when their body dysmorphia overwhelms their shaky sense of self-respect.
So, when you see a jacked dude or lady who stays in primo shape training once or twice per week and eating like a teenager, give them the gimlet eye.
And the same goes for any guy with a suspiciously high normalized FFMI (24 and above), regardless of how rigorous their diet and training protocols are. This level of muscularity is almost always the result of steroid use, not muh genetics, work ethic, or anything else.
And especially if they admit to once using less stigmatized drugs like prohormones, SARMs, and the like. Many of these people don’t want to feel like outright frauds but are too ashamed of their steroid use to admit it, and so see this as an acceptable compromise.
Of course, everything we’re discussing regarding FFMI and steroid use revolves around only one study and you’d inevitably find exceptions and outliers if you analyzed enough people. The data is robust enough for us to know those people would be just that, however—exceptions to the rule.
Naysayers will often point to the bodybuilders and strongmen of old to discredit such an assertion. A number of these men exceeded a normalized FFMI of 25 before the advent of steroids (~1940), they say, and therefore it’s clearly not the true cutoff for natural bodybuilders.
Not so fast.
One issue with relying on data from bodybuilders and strongmen from the late 1800s and early 1900s is there was no formal system of record keeping in place. What’s more, these men would often exaggerate their claims of strength, muscularity, and leanness to draw crowds and sell tickets.
That being what it is, there still were only a small handful who achieved a normalized FFMI above 25.
John Grimek is a good example. He was 5’8 and allegedly weighed 221 pounds at about 8% body fat in his prime (late 1940s), giving him a normalized FFMI of 31.
A few other standouts of the same period were George Eiferman, Steve Stanko, Marvin Eder, and Jack Delinger, all who reported FFMIs north of 26.
If a normalized FFMI of 25 was truly the best a natural weightlifter can get, skeptics say, how do you explain these men’s accomplishments? Clearly the ceiling is higher.
Unsurprisingly, the normalized FFMI of Mr. America winners also started surpassing 25 more and more after the 1940s.
You could say this was due to improvements in training and nutrition, the increasing popularity of bodybuilding, and other factors, but no matter how you slice it, it’s highly unlikely anything but drugs could’ve produced such a marked increase in muscularity in such a short period of time.
I mean, are we really to believe that it’s merely a coincidence that normalized FFMIs made a quantum leap right after the invention and proliferation of the world’s most powerful muscle-building drug?
Occam’s razor, anyone?
Let’s look at John Grimek again to see why we should be highly skeptical.
According to records fastidiously compiled by Terry and Janice Todd, husband-and-wife pioneers of powerlifting and professors at the University of Texas, John Grimek achieved a normalized FFMI of 24 in 1940.
Grimek was already a seasoned bodybuilder at this point and had likely achieved most of his genetic potential for muscle growth, yet just one year later in 1941, his normalized FFMI skyrocketed to 27.
That’s not particularly striking until you crunch the numbers and realize that to increase his normalized FFMI by 3 points, Grimek had to gain damn near 25 pounds of muscle. In a year. As an advanced weightlifter with an already impressively muscular physique.
He did that naturally?
A later reanalysis by the Todds using different methods pegged Grimek’s normalized FFMI at 27 in 1940 and 32 in 1941, but that still means he gained around 27 pounds of muscle in a year.
To my knowledge (and if I’m wrong, feel free to enlighten me in the comments), this kind of progress has never occurred anywhere without a lot of drugs. It’s simply unbelievable. As in you shouldn’t believe it.
Another common postulate used to undermine my position on normalized FFMI and steroid use is that if sumo wrestlers and super heavyweight strongmen and powerlifters reduced their body fat levels, they’d have FFMIs far above 25.
For this to even matter, you’d have to first assume most of these men aren’t using steroids, which would be asinine.
First of all, steroids don’t just help you get bigger and leaner. They also help you recover faster after workouts and increase your strength, power, and even endurance.
In other words, any athlete who can benefit from being bigger, stronger, faster, and more physically resilient can benefit from steroids. Accordingly, just about every professional athlete in the world has good reasons to dope.
Steroids are attractive to powerlifters and strongmen in particular because after about 5 years of consistently correct training, you’ll have more or less maxed out your potential for muscle and strength gains.
At this point, the only way to get much stronger is to gain a considerable amount of muscle, and that simply can’t be done without drugs. Not only that, but many of your competitors will be using steroids, so if you have any ambitions in the sport, you’ll need to as well.
And in the case of sumo wrestlers, they live and die by how big, heavy, and strong they are, so yeah, steroids should be right up their alley.
Let’s play Devil’s advocate and pretend I’m wrong about all of that. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that steroid use is indeed rare among sumo wrestlers, strongmen, and powerlifters. Does the theory that their normalized FFMIs would exceed 25 if they got lean pan out?
A study conducted by scientists at Ibaraki University measured the body fat, lean body mass, and FFMI of 36 professional sumo wrestlers, and found that many of them had a normalized FFMI of around 30. The biggest one had a normalized FFMI of 34.6 at an estimated 33% body fat.
Another study conducted by scientists at the University of Mississippi on the world’s strongest raw powerlifter (someone who lifts without the assistance of straps or suits), Ray Williams, found he had a normalized FFMI of 41 at an estimated 25% body fat.
If you took those numbers at face value, you’d conclude (correctly) that their normalized FFMIs would be significantly higher than 25 if they reduced their body fat levels.
You can’t, however, because if you take one look at your average sumo wrestler or super heavyweight powerlifter like Ray Williams, you know these body fat measurements are suspiciously low.
For example, here are two of the best sumo wrestlers in the world, who are similar in height and weight to the wrestlers analyzed in the study mentioned above:
And here’s a picture of Ray Williams:
If you’ve read my article on estimating body fat percentage, you know all three of these gentlemen are closer to 35 to 40% body fat, not 25 or 30%. This matters because it means they’d have lower normalized FFMIs if they dieted down.
Let’s take Ray Williams as an example.
If we assume he has a body fat percentage of 35% instead of 25%, that drops his normalized FFMI to 35 instead of 41.
There’s another factor to consider that would likely decrease his normalized FFMI even further.
Scientists have known for a long time that as people gain body fat, they also gain a large amount of fat-free mass in the form of connective tissue, water, and other components of fat cells.
This is technically known as “nonessential fat-free mass,” and you can think of it as the infrastructure that supports and nourishes fat cells.
According to some estimates, up to 25% of the weight you gain as you get fatter is nonessential fat-free mass. As a result, if someone were to gain 100 pounds from overeating, up to 25 pounds of it could be nonessential fat-free mass.
This is relevant because FFMI doesn’t distinguish between muscle tissue and these other substances, meaning as body fat levels rise, FFMI can become misleadingly high for the purpose of analyzing body composition.
The same rule applies to weight loss as well, just in reverse.
If someone like Ray Williams were to lose a lot of body fat, he’d also lose quite a bit of nonessential fat-free mass. If you account for this in your calculations, it brings his normalized FFMI down quite a bit.
For instance, if we assume that about 25% of Williams’s “fat-free mass” is in fact connective tissue, water, and such, and we run his numbers again at about 15% body fat, his normalized FFMI is 26, a much more realistic (but not naturally achievable) estimate.
So, here’s the bottom line:
- Bodybuilders of the “drug-free era” (~1940 to 1960) were likely not drug-free. Testosterone wasn’t as mainstream as it is now, but it’s very likely that top-tier bodybuilders were quick to take advantage of it.
- Record keeping during that time was notoriously poor, and in many cases, normalized FFMIs were calculated using unrealistically low body fat levels, usually around 5%. In reality, most of the men were closer to 10% body fat, which would slightly reduce their normalized FFMIs, but not enough to invalidate everything we’ve just discussed.
- Even if you insist most of the old school lifters were au naturel, only eight are on record with a normalized FFMI over 26 and only three exceeded 27. That means about 1% of the top 1% of dedicated weightlifters of that era achieved a normalized FFMI over 25, so why should we assume that just about anyone can now do it too?
- Athletes with large amounts of body fat such as sumo wrestlers, strongmen, powerlifters, and NFL linemen often have a normalized FFMI over 25. This shouldn’t be surprising as we have no reason to believe they’re natural. Even if they weren’t using steroids, however, if they were to cut down to 10 to 15% body fat, their normalized FFMIs would look far more reasonable.
- The normalized FFMI cutoff of 25 isn’t a hard-and-fast, “everyone, everywhere, anytime” rule. It’s entirely possible that genetic freaks have attained a normalized FFMI above 25 naturally, but they’re very rare exceptions. Based on all the available data, it’s fair to say that virtually everybody who picks up a barbell is capable of achieving a normalized FFMI in the 22 to 23 range, and virtually nobody will see 24 or beyond without steroids.
- Many current and past steroid users have a normalized FFMI below 25. Some have sub-par genetics, some take smaller doses, some don’t train intensely or frequently enough, some don’t eat well or sleep enough, some don’t want to be that big, and some (“influencers,” usually) even stage-manage their FFMIs by lying about their height, weight, and body fat percentage to avoid being pegged as drug users.
So, now that we’ve learned the lay of the land, let’s circle back to the question posed in the beginning of this section:
How can you tell if someone is natty or not? Here’s what the evidence says:
- If someone’s normalized FFMI is over 25, it’s almost certain they’re taking or have taken steroids.
- If someone’s normalized FFMI is between 24 and 25, then it’s likely they’re taking or have taken steroids.
- If someone’s normalized FFMI is between 22 and 23 and they’ve been training consistently for 3+ years, they may be natural.
- If someone’s normalized FFMI is between 21 and 22, they may be natural as well.
- If someone’s normalized FFMI is between 18 and 21, they likely don’t even lift so who cares. 🙂
(And remember that we’re talking just about men here. Unfortunately, there’s no data on the correlation between steroid use and FFMI in women. It’s fair to assume, however, that their ceiling is significantly lower than men’s.)
If you’re unsure why I said people with normalized FFMIs below 25 “may” be natural, the answer is simple:
There are plenty of guys using steroids with normalized FFMIs below 25 for the reasons given earlier. That’s why you have to consider factors other than normalized FFMI when determining whether someone is likely using drugs or not, including . . .
They’re the trifecta of bodybuilding: big, lean, and strong.
A common joke among natural bodybuilders is you get to pick two of the following three options:
- You can be big.
- You can be lean.
- You can be strong.
If you want all three, you need to take steroids.
It’s not entirely accurate—if you’re lean and strong you’re probably fairly big as well—but it alludes to reality:
If you want to be big and strong, forget about being lean, and if you want to be big and lean, forget about being strong. And let’s be honest: if you want to be big and lean, you probably can’t be “big,” but something more akin to “not small.”
More importantly, no matter what you do in the kitchen and gym, you’ll never be able to stay big, lean, and strong by any worthy standards.
This is why jacked, shredded dudes who press, pull, and squat gargantuan amounts of weight are basically dripping in steroids.
And just to put numbers to this, if we consult commonly accepted strength standards for a 200-pound man, this would look something like . . .
- Benching over 400 pounds
- Squatting over 500 pounds
- Deadlifting over 600 pounds
. . . and for a 160-pound woman it would look like . . .
- Benching over 200 pounds
- Squatting over 300 pounds
- Deadlifting over 400 pounds
. . . while also sporting supersized muscles and low body fat levels.
And yes I know, strength doesn’t perfectly correlate with muscularity and there are people who can get freakishly strong without taking drugs, and especially on one exercise in particular.
In the final analysis, however, the biggest people in the gym tend to be the strongest, and when the biggest and strongest people are also the leanest, they’re taking steroids.
They suddenly got way stronger.
A large jump in strength in an intermediate or advanced weightlifter is a major indicator of steroid use.
After your first couple years of proper training, you’ll be lucky to add 50 total pounds to your big compound lifts in a single year. And once you’ve been training for 7 to 10 years, adding 10 pounds to your bench press, squat, or deadlift in one year is cause for celebration (seriously).
And just for the sake of contrast, in a steroid study we reviewed earlier, lifters with about one year of training experience took steroids and added 132 pounds to their squat and bench press in just 10 weeks. That’s absurd and shows just how much of a difference drugs can make.
So if an experienced lifter “naturally” adds 50 pounds or more to a major exercise in one year or less, well, let’s just say we have a word for that in English. It’s called, “suspicious.” As in, suspiciously full of shit.
They have a massive upper chest, shoulders, and traps.
This is a reliable sign of drug use because these areas of the body have a lot of androgen receptors, which are special types of proteins in cells that respond to anabolic hormones like testosterone.
When you take steroids, these receptors go into overdrive and cause these muscle groups to develop much faster than others.
Here’s a good example of this look, which I pulled from a steroid forum where guys openly talk about their cycles:
This is also true for women, although female drug users tend to be easier to spot using the next criterion.
They’re shredded, dry, and full, with amazing muscle separation.
You can get very lean and dry naturally, but you can’t achieve that look of being carved out of marble with full, striated, “3D” muscles that “pop” off your bones.
For example, here’s a shot of me at about 183 pounds and 7% body fat:
This is more or less the best I can possibly look without drugs. And while I think I did a good job getting lean and preserving muscle, compare it to the following picture of a well-known bodybuilder and fitness model:
Oh, and he stays like that more or less year round. I guess I just don’t have enough #dedication.
This is particularly apparent with female steroid users who are able to maintain very low body fat percentages compared to what most women can achieve naturally:
This level of leanness, size, and separation simply isn’t achievable for women without steroids, and fat burners like clenbuterol are often involved as well.
They stay extremely lean, full, and dry year round.
This is a corollary to the previous point.
The problems are many: you can’t eat enough food to feel good, your training goes to shit, your sleep suffers, your sex drive plummets, and your energy levels bottom out. The human body just wasn’t meant to stay that lean.
The right drugs change all of this. All of a sudden, you can stay absolutely shredded while eating piles of food, sleeping far less than recommended, and pushing yourself through grueling workouts.
If you have good genetics, maintaining 10% body fat for men and 20% for women year round is possible, but it requires that you carefully watch what you eat and how much you exercise.
Staying leaner while also enjoying significant size, energy, and conditioning, however, is only possible with some “chemical assistance.”
They have excellent overall development and proportions.
As I mentioned earlier in this article, it’s rare to find a natural lifter who has perfect size, symmetry, and definition in all major muscle groups.
With steroid users, however, this becomes relatively common.
I’m a good example of this rule. While my upper body, glutes, and quads are fairly well developed and proportional, my calves are still relatively small and my shoulders are barely keeping up.
One of the guys who works with me has a similar issue: His quads, calves, and chest are well developed, but his back, shoulders, and arms are less than impressive.
If we were to take drugs, though, it wouldn’t take long for us to fill in our lagging muscle groups (and this is the only way my calves would ever match the sizes of my arms, which is considered ideal among bodybuilders).
Why? Two reasons:
- Every cell in the body has androgen receptors and artificially raising your androgen levels forces even stubborn muscle groups like the calves, shoulders, and arms to grow.
- Steroid users can more easily “sculpt” their bodies by neglecting their strong points (which will stay big) and hammering their weak points (which will grow rapidly).
They have bad acne and male-pattern baldness.
Some people are genetically prone to breakouts and baldness, but steroids can aggravate these problems.
This why acne-covered chests and backs and receding hairlines are so prevalent among bodybuilders, and particularly those who are huge, shredded, dry, and full.
To hide this, steroid users often photoshop and filter out pimples and acne scars in pictures they post online, but every so often a candid shot makes its way into the wild and looks something like this:
It’s also common for steroid users to have unusually thick, fast-growing facial and chest hair—another side effect of the masculinizing properties of anabolic drugs.
By now, you’ve probably realized that the highest your normalized FFMI will probably ever get is in the range of 22 to 24, depending on how you eat, train, recover, and how your body is hardwired.
For instance, here’s me after nearly 16 years of training, with the last 7 or so particularly dialed in:
View this post on Instagram
And guess what my normalized FFMI is?
About 23, or “frail” by Instagram standards. And I’m okay with that. I like the way I look, feel, and perform, and I like that I don’t need to inject and ingest a cocktail of chemicals every week and then lie about it to enjoy my body and trick people into buying my trinkets.
You can do the same.
Regardless of where your normalized FFMI will ultimately settle, you can rest assured you’re going to have the type of body most people would kill for. No drugs necessary.
If you want to reach your natural potential for muscle growth, you need an effective diet and training plan.
You want to gain muscle and not just get fat, and you have to do more than just “eat big” to do that.
Fortunately, though, it’s not complicated. There are just five simple steps.
- Eat slightly more calories than you burn.
- Eat a high-protein and high-carb diet.
- Don’t cheat/overeat too much.
- Do a lot of heavy compound weightlifting.
- Take the right supplements.
Let’s get to it.
(And if you prefer a 13-minute video overview, just click below.)
The biggest mistake people that “can’t gain weight” make is not eating enough calories.
Their natural appetites just aren’t up to it.
And by “it,” I mean consistently eating more calories than they burn, which is what you need to do to gain muscle and strength as quickly as possible.
There are various reasons for this, mainly physiological, but we don’t have to get into them here. All you need to know is that your body’s “muscle-building machinery” just works best when energy is abundant.
Another major mistake that “hardgainers” often make is the opposite of the above: eating way too much.
Unfortunately, it’s not.
You can’t force your muscles to grow faster by drowning them in calories, because beyond a certain point, they stop fueling muscle growth and just make you fatter.
That’s why a slight calorie surplus of 10 to 15% is just as conducive to muscle growth as a larger surplus of 30% or more.
That is, all you have to do to optimize muscle growth is eat just 10 to 15% more calories than you burn every day.
This is the point of diminishing returns, where increasing your calorie intake further contributes less and less to muscle building and more and more to fat gain.
And gaining too much fat does more than hurt your ego. It also makes it harder to build muscle by negatively impacting your insulin sensitivity, making it more likely that the calories you consume will be stored as fat, not muscle.
This is why you should shy away from “dirty bulking,” as bodybuilders call it, and opt to “lean bulk” instead.
This approach is a win-win because it allows you to maximize muscle growth and minimize fat gain.
And, just in case you’re curious, most people can gain muscle and fat at about a 1:1 ratio when they’re doing everything right.
In other words, if you gain a pound of muscle for every pound of fat while lean bulking, you’re doing a good job.
(Those with above-average genetics can gain slightly more muscle than fat, and those with below-average genetics may gain slightly more fat than muscle, but most people are in the middle.)
Want to know how many calories you should eat? Check out this article:
You’ve probably heard that a high-protein diet is best for building muscle.
This is true, and that’s why there’s so much talk about protein in bodybuilding circles.
Protein provides your body with the raw materials necessary for muscle building (amino acids), so if you don’t eat enough, you’ll struggle to gain muscle.
What is “enough,” though?
It’s quite a bit more than most people are used to eating (but not quite as much as some people claim).
Research shows that eating about 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight per day is ideal for muscle gain.
Either way, it comes out to around 30 to 40% of total daily calories for most people.
Now, while there’s little debate on the importance of eating adequate protein, carbs are another story.
Low-carb diets are a “thing” these days, but they really don’t deserve the hype.
They don’t help you lose fat faster, and they most definitely don’t help you gain muscle faster, either.
To the contrary, eating plenty of carbs helps you gain muscle faster in two ways:
- It increases whole-body glycogen levels, which improves workout performance and enhances genetic signalling related to muscle growth.
- It keeps insulin levels generally higher, which lowers muscle breakdown rates and creates a more anabolic environment in the body.
So, here’s the bottom line:
If you want to gain muscle as quickly as possible, then you want to eat more and not less carbs.
A good starting place is to get 30 to 50% of your total daily calories from carbs.
Want to know more about how much protein and carbs you should eat? Check out this article:
“I’m bulking, bro,” he says, as he eats a pile of candy and washes it down with a quart of chocolate milk.
Don’t be that guy (or gal). Don’t let your lean bulk go “dirty.”
It’s easy to loosen the reins when you’re not restricting calories to lose fat, and this is a mistake.
If you want to maximize muscle gain and minimize fat gain, you need to regulate your calories and macros almost as carefully when bulking as when cutting.
If you have too many cheat meals (or, worse, cheat days) while bulking, it’ll catch up with you sooner rather than later, because you will gain fat faster and faster, which will slow you down in the long run.
Eating too many high-sugar, highly processed, non-nutritious foods causes other problems, too.
For example . . .
- You can develop vitamin and mineral deficiencies that can lead to a number of health problems.
- Eating too many highly processed carbs is associated with an increased risk of chronic disease.
- The same goes for eating too much low-quality, highly processed meats.
- Eating even small amounts of trans fats raises your risk of heart disease, diabetes, infertility, and other undesirable conditions.
Many people also find it hard to break away from an uninhibited, gluttonous style of eating when it comes time to finally get rid of unwanted body fat, making it even more difficult to reach their desired body fat percentage.
Want to know more about how to cheat without ruining your diet? Check out this article:
If you don’t get the first three steps right, what you do in the gym won’t matter very much.
Proper dieting is just that important.
If you do, though, the right workout program will make a huge difference in how quickly you can gain weight and muscle.
Sure, you can gain muscle and strength in many different ways, but decades of scientific and anecdotal evidence have conclusively proven that this is the most effective approach.
The reason heavy compound weightlifting is so powerful is simple: it’s the best way to progressively overload your muscles.
And by “progressively overloading” your muscles, I mean forcing them to produce greater and greater levels of tension over time. This is the primary driver of muscle growth, and while there are several ways to do this, the most effective one is just getting stronger.
That’s why the strongest people in the gym are also generally the biggest, and if you want to build a great physique, why your primary goal should be increasing whole-body strength.
Want to know more about how to build a workout program that really works? Check out this article:
I saved this for last because it’s the least important.
The truth is most supplements for building muscle and losing fat are worthless.
Unfortunately, no amount of pills and powders are going to make you muscular and lean.
That said, if you know how to drive muscle growth with proper dieting and exercise, certain supplements can accelerate the process.
Here are the ones I use and recommend:
Atlas Mass Gainer
In an ideal world, we’d get all of our daily calories from carefully prepared, nutritionally balanced meals, and we’d have the time to sit down, slow down, and savor each and every bite.
In the real world, though, we’re usually rushing from one obligation to another and often forget to eat anything, let alone the optimal foods for building muscle, losing fat, and staying healthy.
That’s why meal replacement and “weight gainer” supplements and protein bars and snacks are more popular than ever.
Unfortunately, most contain low-quality protein powders and large amounts of simple sugars and unnecessary junk.
That’s why I created Atlas.
It’s a delicious “weight gainer” (meal replacement) supplement that provides you with 38 grams of high-quality protein per serving, along with 51 grams of nutritious, food-based carbohydrates, and just 6 grams of natural fats, as well as 26 micronutrients, enzymes, and probiotics that help you feel and perform your best.
Atlas is also 100% naturally sweetened and flavored as well, and contains no chemical dyes, cheap fillers, or other unnecessary junk.
So, if you want to build muscle and lose fat as quickly as possible and improve the nutritional quality of your diet, you want to try Atlas today.
Recharge Post-Workout Supplement
Recharge is a 100% natural post-workout supplement that helps you gain muscle and strength faster, and recover better from your workouts.
Once it’s had time to accumulate in your muscles (about a week of use), the first thing you’re going to notice is increased strength and anaerobic endurance, less muscle soreness, and faster post-workout muscle recovery.
And the harder you can train in your workouts and the faster you can recover from them, the more muscle and strength you’re going to build over time.
Furthermore, Recharge doesn’t need to be cycled, which means it’s safe for long-term use, and its effects don’t diminish over time.
It’s also naturally sweetened and flavored and contains no artificial food dyes, fillers, or other unnecessary junk.
So, if you want to be able to push harder in the gym, train more frequently, and get more out of your workouts, you want to try Recharge today.
Whey+ Protein Powder
Whey protein powder is a staple in most athletes’ diets for good reason.
It’s digested quickly, it’s absorbed well, it has a fantastic amino acid profile, and it’s easy on the taste buds.
Not all whey proteins are created equal, though.
Whey concentrate protein powder, for example, can be as low as 30% protein by weight, and can also contain a considerable amount of fat and carbs.
And the more fat and carbs you’re drinking, the less you can actually enjoy in your food.
Whey isolate protein powder, on the other hand, is the purest whey protein you can buy. It’s 90%+ protein by weight and has almost no fat or carbs.
Another benefit of whey isolate is it contains no lactose, which means better digestibility and fewer upset stomachs.
Well, Whey+ is a 100% naturally sweetened and flavored whey isolate protein powder made from exceptionally high-quality milk from small dairy farms in Ireland.
It contains no GMOs, hormones, antibiotics, artificial food dyes, fillers, or other unnecessary junk, and it tastes delicious and mixes great.
So, if you want a clean, all-natural, and great tasting whey protein supplement that’s low in calories, carbs, and fat, you want to try Whey+ today.
Is your pre-workout simply not working anymore?
Are you sick and tired of pre-workout drinks that make you sick and tired?
Have you had enough of upset stomachs, jitters, nausea, and the dreaded post-workout crash?
Do you wish your pre-workout supplement gave you sustained energy and more focus and motivation to train? Do you wish it gave you noticeably better workouts and helped you hit PRs?
If you’re nodding your head, then you’re going to love Pulse.
It increases energy, improves mood, sharpens mental focus, increases strength and endurance, and reduces fatigue . . . without unwanted side effects or the dreaded post-workout crash.
It’s also naturally sweetened and flavored and contains no artificial food dyes, fillers, or other unnecessary junk.
Lastly, it contains no proprietary blends and each serving delivers nearly 20 grams of active ingredients scientifically proven to improve performance.
So, if you want to feel focused, tireless, and powerful in your workouts . . . and if you want to say goodbye to the pre-workout jitters, upset stomachs, and crashes for good . . . you want to try Pulse today.
Everyone has a genetic limit to how much muscle they can gain.
The best predictor of this seems to be the size of our skeleton, which we can estimate using our wrist and ankle circumference measurements.
Although testosterone is the primary hormonal driver of muscle growth, fluctuations within the physiological normal range don’t significantly help or hurt muscle growth in the long run.
The easiest way to estimate your potential for muscularity is to plug your numbers into the calculator in this article, and subtract 5% from the answer.
You may not be impressed by the number you see, but the good news is you probably don’t have to build as much muscle as you think to have the body you really want.
If you’re a guy, once you’ve added about 20 pounds of muscle and reduced your body fat to about 10%, you’re going to look fantastic. And if you’re a woman, 10 pounds of muscle in the right places with your body fat around 20% is more or less ideal by most female standards.
And anybody can do those things.
Whatever you do, don’t fall into the trap of comparing yourself to the unrealistic expectations set by steroid users.
The best way to determine if a guy is on steroids is to calculate his normalized FFMI. If it’s over 25, then he’s almost certainly on or has used steroids, and if it’s right there (24 or 25), he should probably be considered guilty until proven innocent.
Most natural male lifters can achieve a normalized FFMI of 22 to 23, and a very small handful of genetically gifted ones can approach 25.
Unfortunately, it’s not clear what the normalized FFMI natural cutoff is for women, and there’s no evidence-based way to detect female drug use yet.
So, if you want to reach your natural genetic potential for muscle growth as soon as possible, follow these five steps:
- Eat slightly more calories than you burn.
- Eat a high-protein and high-carb diet.
- Don’t cheat/overeat too much.
- Do a lot of heavy compound weightlifting.
- Take the right supplements.
Do that, and I promise you’ll be happy with the results.